FAQ
Epic Journey Value Proposition
- The Epic EHR will allow UAB Medicine and our associated community partners, facilities and referring providers to maintain consistency and continuity of care across the communities and geographies we serve.
- This patient-centered initiative, led by Operations and HSIS, unifies our entities under a single EHR system that streamlines clinical processes and simplifies collaboration.
- Epic delivers value for everyone involved. As a health system that spans multiple geographies, patient demographics, and care teams, this single EHR will deliver:
- Increased clinician satisfaction with an automation-driven process and seamless collaboration between care teams
- Enhanced patient safety with standardized protocols, workflows and tools
- Example: A single EHR will allow for continuous care coordination across multiple locations for patients served, standardizing care delivery and increasing visibility into patient diagnoses, treatment and follow-up.
- Improved care coordination through enterprise-wide integrated communications and patient record availability
- Example: Care teams will have access to all patient records for all visits across care facilities, streamlining care delivery and increasing visibility into the patient-care life cycle.
- Streamlined technical landscape by eliminating multiple data centers, more than 130 applications, and more than 260 system integrations
- Example: Standard Epic workflows and applications will eliminate the need for disparate third-party applications, allowing the care team to work from a single, core platform without excess.
- One core platform for patients and clinicians to access information, scheduling, statements, and clinical resources
- Example: Patients can coordinate visits across all in-scope entities in one single platform, while the care team can coordinate follow-ups, appointments, and patient resources within a single system.
- More efficient research operations by using a seamlessly integrated solution with our existing clinical trial management system (OnCore) for optimized trial management and billing
- Example: Epic provides a robust billing protocol review process that will provide compliance while maximizing our research staff’s time.
- Increased research opportunities via Epic Cosmos, including more than 260 million de-identified patient records to support research growth and clinical trials
- Example: Cosmos users can use data from many institutions to gain a better understanding of treatment outcomes across a broader population.
- We are committed to aligning with over 90% of Epic’s Foundation System, meaning we will implement the standard Epic EHR and escalate decisions that require deviations from the Foundation System.
- See additional FAQs in the Epic Foundation System section.
- Each entity will have representation in how Epic is built and configured, despite staggered launch (“go-live”) dates.
- See additional FAQs in the Build Wave section.
Timeline
The entities in-scope for Epic include:
UAB St. Vincent’s Go-Live (July 2026) | Full Go-Live (February 2027) |
---|---|
UAB St. Vincent’s Blount | Cooper Green Mercy |
UAB St. Vincent’s Birmingham | UA College of Community Health |
UAB St. Vincent’s Chilton | UAB HSF Clinics |
UAB St. Vincent’s East | UAB Callahan Eye Hospital |
UAB St. Vincent’s St. Clair | UAB Callahan OSF Clinics |
UAB St. Vincent’s Clinics | UAB Clinics |
UAB St. Vincent’s One Nineteen | UAB Hospital |
UAB St. Vincent’s FED | UAB Medical West Hospital |
UAB School of Dentistry | |
UAB School of Health Professionals | |
UAB School of Nursing | |
UAB School of Optometry | |
UAB SOM Selma Family Medicine | |
UAB SOM Huntsville Regional |
From April 2025 to October 2025, Advisory Groups and Operational Workgroups will be making decisions that support the build and configuration of Epic’s Foundation System to meet the needs of each in-scope entity.
The Epic Journey phases include:
UAB St. Vincent’s | Full Go-Live | Details | |
---|---|---|---|
Phase 1: Configure | April – October 2025 | April – October 2025 | – Establish advisory groups and operational workgroups; facilitate and document key Epic implementation and workflow decisions – Finalize clinical and revenue cycle workflow design and complete system build |
Phase 2: Readiness | November 2025 – May 2026 | August – December 2026 | – Develop and implement testing strategy for major Epic testing objectives including integrated testing, PRCT, etc. – Establish change-management processes, document future-state change impacts to operations |
Phase 3: Training | May – July 2026 | January – February 2027 | – Coordinate and execute training for all impacted end users across the organization – Prepare operational owners; finalize go-live readiness activities such as sequencing, command center set-up, activation |
Phase 4: Post-Live | August – September 2026 | March – April 2027 | – Support the system-wide go-live through the strategic placement of ATE support and super users across the organization – Monitor St. Vincent’s post-go-live performance metrics; work across IT and operations to reach baseline goals |
Phase 5: Optimization | October 2026 – April 2027 | April 2027 + | – Apply similar strategy, plus lessons learned from the St. Vincent’s go-live to support the UAB roll-out – Monitor UAB’s post-go-live performance metrics; work across IT and operations to reach baseline goals |
High-level training timelines are as follows and should be communicated to appropriate audiences as relevant:
Activity | Start Date | End Date |
---|---|---|
Super user training for UAB St. Vincent’s Go-Live | May 2, 2026 | May 29, 2026 |
End-user training and day-in-the-life for UAB St. Vincent’s Go-Live | May 30, 2026 | July 24, 2026 |
Super user training for Full Go-Live | December 7, 2026 | January 1, 2027 |
End-user training and day-in-the-life for Full Go-Live | January 4, 2027 | February 26, 2027 |
Registration start for UAB St. Vincent’s Go-Live | January 7, 2026 | January 7, 2026 |
Registration start for Full Go-Live | September 21, 2025 | September 21, 2025 |
Epic Foundation System
- Epic’s Foundation System is the standard version upon which each in-scope entity will build the Epic EHR. It includes pre-defined settings, sample reports, and starter sets for clinical and specialty areas. This will be tailored to meet specific organizational needs and workflows.
- Our leaders have made the decision to align with more than 90% of Epic’s Foundation System, based on Epic-recommended best practices.
- The benefit is that Epic has been built to work for community and university-based medical centers similar to ours in size and function.
- We are confident that the Foundation System will meet our needs but also understand certain workflows will need to be configured and personalized for individual, department, and specialty preferences.
- See additional FAQs in the Build Wave section.
- For more information on Epic Foundation System principles and sources, click here.
Advisory Groups and Operational Workgroups
Representatives from across all in-scope entities were nominated and appointed to Advisory Groups responsible for making decisions about the configuration (e.g., build) of the Epic EHR to meet the needs of our employees and patients.
There are six different Advisory Group Workstreams guiding the build of Epic:
- Analytics
- Ambulatory
- Physician and APP
- Inpatient
- Revenue Cycle
- Technical
There are 55 different Operational Workgroups, with representatives from across all in-scope entities, who are making key decisions about the build of Epic and validating the Foundation System, content, and workflows. Each Workgroup reports to an Advisory Group.
Operational Workgroup members are an extension of their specialty, role, and location. These members will solicit feedback from end-users on key decisions that need to be made outside of Epic’s Foundation System.
As necessary, Subject Matter Expert (SME) Groups will be activated to provide additional insight on the build of Epic. If you are selected as an SME, you will receive notification about your nomination, expectations of the role, a timeline for involvement, and desired outcomes.
Approximately 75% of the decisions being made about Epic will be discussed during Operational Workgroup meetings. These decisions impact the configuration of Epic’s Foundation System.
Approximately 15% of the decisions being made about Epic are brought to Advisory Groups who provide guidance to the executive teams and workgroups with expertise in their respective areas. These decisions tend to have an impact on budget and scope of the Epic Journey.
The remaining ~10% of decisions about Epic are made at the Executive Sponsor and Executive Steering Committee levels and pertain to overall direction, timing, and strategy of the Epic EHR Implementation.